It’s a woman’s right to choose: A Christian looks at the debate

pf button both It’s a woman’s right to choose: A Christian looks at the debate

I hear my brothers and sisters crying out for justice while the Republican Taliban machine churns out a message denying women the right to choose whether to carry a child full term into independent life. The Republican’s are clearly in the wrong when they say they would outlaw and criminalize abortions. It ultimately is the woman’s choice and may no man thwart that truth.

In my heart and in my Bible, the truth rings out: God is decidedly pro-life. But that truth also goes along with the truth that God gives us free will, to live life on this earth as we see fit. Yes, we must follow and adhere to the laws in this country. And, if we don’t agree with the law, then our democracy provides us with ways to change it. So, all of this arguing for abortion in the case of rape, incest, or the life of the mother is incorrectly used in the discussion for allowing abortion in the sense of making it legal or illegal.

Nobody has the right to tell a woman what to do with her body. Never is it alright to do so. We do not live in a theocracy, thank God for that. In this country, we are indeed a nation of laws, but not God’s law. Never have been and I hope we never will be.

I’m certain, that in most people’s heart, they would rather see a child born and not have its life terminated by abortion. It’s only natural that we feel this way. Many Christians miss this point, they think our country can dictate what set of moral laws to live by, but the fact is, we can’t do that. As a nation, we must keep the right for people to choose their path in life. As Christians, believers must recognize that our government is not here to fall back on in case of moral failure. That’s not the government’s job or place.

Christians win hearts by loving God and loving others, in spite of the decisions others make in their lives. The truth is that God loves us all, 100% of the time. Not just some of us, but all of us. And, He is a God of second chances. While it is true that many women who have gone through with abortions find out later they have issues with regret and anger, we, as Christians, can only offer our love and well placed words of encouragement and understanding. We should never try to legislate morality, because it never works. The only thing that does work is God’s love working through His people to reach out to love and help others.

I hope God’s word of love reaches the hearts of the Republican Taliban in this country and gives them a chance to soften their stance and outlook toward women. It’s all we have to go on. That, and of course, prayer.

Where are the jobs, Mr. Speaker?

pf button both Where are the jobs, Mr. Speaker?

In 2010, the Republicans seized control of the House of Representatives like never before, even eclipsing the 1994 takeover. It was at that time that John Boehner, R-Ohio, assumed the job as Speaker of the House, a job formerly held by Nancy Pelosi, D-California.

Boehner made some statements then that I want to remind you of today. On election night, 2010, Boehner said, “For far too long, Washington has been doing what’s best for Washington – not what’s best for America, tonight, that begins to change.”

He went on to say this: “The people’s priorities will be our priorities. The people’s agenda will be our agenda. This is our pledge to America, this is our pledge to you! It’s clear who the winners are tonight, and that’s the American people. Your voice was heard at the ballot box! Your voice.”

Then he made another promise: “It starts with cutting spending instead of increasing it, reducing the size of government instead of expanding it, reforming the way Congress works and giving government back to the people and for all those families asking ‘where are the jobs?,’ it means ending the uncertainty in our economy and helping small businesses get back to work.”

Jobs. Where are the jobs you promised to create, Mr. Speaker? President Obama has sent many jobs bills to the House but not one has been voted on. Why? Oh, you’ve made excuses and even flat-out lied about things like taxes, the stimulus, and student loans, but you’ve been quiet about jobs. Why?

Since 2010, when you assumed the leadership role in the house, here is what you’ve accomplished: 46 Abortion Bills 113 Religion Bills, 36 Marriage Bills, and 72 Gun Bills. That’s it. You’ve failed, Mr. Speaker. You lied to America.

Reviewing A conversation with God, by Alton Gansky

pf button both Reviewing A conversation with God, by Alton Gansky

This book is a very simplified look at questions that all of us have. But how do we know that the answers given in this book are from God about our particular situation? We can’t. And therein lies the problem that I have with books like this. I think for a baby Christian and perhaps even those who are seekers can glean some knowledge from this effort but for more authoritative information, it leaves me wanting more.

We’re fighting for the soul of our nation

pf button both We’re fighting for the soul of our nation

The difference between the 1% and the 99% is not ideology, its opportunity. Sure, we may all disagree on governance and how to go about running a democracy, but most of us need one thing to give us a jumpstart these days, and that is an opportunity to prove that we are better able to deliver on the promise of capitalism than someone from another country. Yes, even another communist country like China.

The Republicans want you to believe that this is all about ideology and class warfare, but the truth is it’s not. Not even close. We all aspire to do wonderful and great things. Most of us despise the circumstances that our country finds itself in these days, with high unemployment and a declining middle class.

The facts reveal that we provide tax breaks, in the millions of dollars, to companies that are outsourcing our manufacturing jobs to countries where there are lower wages and no corporate taxes. As a country, we look the other way at offshore tax havens like Bermuda, the Bahamas, and the Cayman Islands. Is there any more proof that we need to take action? As Senator Bernie Sanders points out: “There is a five story office building in the Cayman Islands that is “home” to over 18,000 companies.” Truth be told, corporate profits are near or at an all-time high while corporate tax revenue is at the lowest since 1972.

We have work to do in closing these huge loopholes in our tax system. We are fighting for the very soul of our democracy. People with modest incomes and the elderly live from paycheck to paycheck and that is not what our democracy is all about. So, if you can find a few moments, call your representative and share your sentiments, it will help dramatically.

Hagel nomination a good move by President Obama

pf button both Hagel nomination a good move by President Obama

The nomination of Chuck Hagel is a death blow to the Republican neo-cons who were once led by Dick Cheney, and whose misguided ideology led to the war in Iraq. Indeed, Hagel was once a vociferous supporter of activity in Iraq but after several years of misinformation became an angry opponent of the war. Hagel is an in your face nomination, read appointment, to the hawks in Washington who still support nation building and war to diplomacy. Hagel believes, as Obama does, that war is the last resort, is it any wonder that the two are personal friends?

Obama also wants to seek bipartisanship, even though the Republicans want nothing of the sort. So, it’s more of the same in Washington: Deadlock and rancor. To be sure, John McCain and Lindsey Graham have already expressed misgivings about his nomination. Hagels stances on gays and Israel have been called into question, but that is all a smokescreen to deny true bipartisanship in our Capitol. He supports Israel, by the way and will stand proudly with gay soldiers.

Hagel will be the first enlisted veteran (Vietnam) to lead the Pentagon. His first order of duty is to reign in the military budget. Had we gone over the fiscal cliff then the military would have succumbed to a 31% budget cut, called a sequester. Many now, on both sides of the aisle, are making statements that they agree to a budget cut at our near that rate. Look at it this way: We spend 771 billion on defense while the next 13 countries combined spend 695 billion. In addition, our defense budget has more than doubled since 2001.

Chuck Hagel is an outstanding selection and we all should applaud President Obama for standing against the hawks and neo-cons that have run this country into the ground.

Wide Receiver Stephen Hill will be a steal for the team that drafts him

pf button both Wide Receiver Stephen Hill will be a steal for the team that drafts him

Stephen Hill played college football at a school that doesn’t have much of a passing offense and it’s the belief here that he will be a steal for any team that drafts him in this year’s NFL draft.

It’s true that Hill only had 28 receptions in his last year of college ball, but look at his physical measurements and the combine score he has. He stands 6 feet, 4 inches and weighs 215 pounds. At the combine, he moved his large frame to an excellent 4.36 40 yard dash while posting a vertical leap of 39 inches. He’s just the type of receiver that many teams salivate over. In his college career, he had 49 receptions for 1,248 yards, averaging 25.5 yards per catch.

While Justin Blackmon and others are getting all the hype, Hill has inched his way into conversations among teams looking to fill their WR needs. He will be a first round pick. But where will he go?

Some say Cincinnati, and wouldn’t that be a pairing to watch, with A.J. Green lined up opposite him? It’s purely speculation at this point but that pair would be electrifying to the Bengal fans.

Looking at more stats that support Hill’s emergence into the first round, is his YPA or Yards per Attempt. It stands at 12, the highest of this WR class going into the draft. His VYPA or Vertical Yards per Attempt is also first in this class, at 15.5. He is the tallest of this class and clocked the best 40 time of all WR’s at the combine.

The only thing that is keeping him from being a top 10 pick is that he is a raw talent. The team that takes him will have to coach him up to play at the NFL level. But that shouldn’t be a hindrance to many teams. The Patriots and Forty-Niner’s would love to have him in their stable, but my belief is that he will be gone by the time they get their chance to draft him.

Hill will be more explosive than Demaryius Thomas, who is also a Tech product. He just doesn’t have the injury issues that Thomas has.

He attended Miller Grove High School in Lithonia, Georgia. Miller Grove is a good school with a reputation for turning out good football players. In high school, he earned a three star ranking from Scouts and was ranked number 99 at his position.

NFL cracking down on rowdy behavior in 2012

pf button both NFL cracking down on rowdy behavior in 2012

Evidently, the NFL has heard rowdy fans loud and clear enough to determine that they don’t want to hear their rambunctious and obnoxious behavior anymore.

It’s true that stadium drunks are annoying but really this new rule is going a bit too far. Part of the atmosphere at football games is tailgating and drinking. Are we really ready for a rule that states if you are removed from a stadium for rowdy behavior that you have to take and pass an online code-of-conduct test that costs $75 or else be banned from future NFL games? Further, if you are discovered at a game after banishment and you haven’t passed the test, you will be arrested for trespassing.

This seems a bit extreme, but it’s true. My imagination is that somehow the religious right has infiltrated the NFL front office, but that can’t be, because Commissioner Goodell is a level-headed and reasonable person, isn’t he?

Almost everybody has encountered a drunk at a stadium at some point in their lives. We all know they can be annoying and truly capable of making an ass of themselves. But surely we all know how to handle these people, don’t we? Are we going to ruin NFL events because of a few drunks?

Stadiums report that they remove between 25 and 40 people per game for unruly behavior. Fine, let them be removed, arrested, whatever. But to take it to the extreme and require an online visit to take a test on conduct or risk being arrested for trespassing is beyond the pale.

Dr. Ari Novick, a California psychotherapist, is the author of the test and in fact, developed this idea himself. He gets to pocket $55 of the $75, and sends the rest to MADD, Mothers Against Drunk Driving and the HERO campaign for Designated Drivers.  If you are removed from a game, and later do not take the test, then stadium security will look for you, using video monitors, because they will have your picture, name and seat number. Once found, they will have you arrested.

So, what kinds of questions are on the test? Here are some examples:

1)      Behaving badly toward other fans, such as fighting, swearing or threatening them, is OK as long as they deserve it. Answer: False

2)      According to MetLife Stadium’s alcohol policies, four drinks is the maximum a person may purchase at a time. Answer: False, it’s two.

3)      Every fan has a right to like any team they wish. Using abusive language towards fans that support teams you don’t like will not be tolerated. Answer: True

The website that hosts the test is here. At MetLife stadium, fans that are removed must also write a letter of apology to security Chief Daniel Delorenzi.

The NFL has the right intention but is being too heavy-handed with this policy. If you want to limit rowdy behavior, there are other ways of doing it than this.

 

The political discourse in this country is alarming

pf button both The political discourse in this country is alarming

Politics is a big endeavor. It involves a lot of closed-door deal brokering, compromising of long-held beliefs, raising lots of money and winning the votes of the electorate. There is much more involved, of course, but you get the idea, it’s a full-time and difficult job. Many people get into politics for the right reason, a chance to make a difference and an opportunity to provide leadership at all levels of our society. And many of them do, and they are successful at their craft. Some, however, are lacking the skills required for the position and often times are voted from office, much to the delight of their respective communities.

One of the biggest items on any politician’s agenda is leadership and how to lead their constituents on a regular basis. The leader must be consistent, both in response to query’s and in their stated goals for the duration of their term in office. The leader must also present idea’s that will sustain a viable future for his constituency and work to make sure the passage of those idea’s into laws that govern our land so that future generations will benefit from not only his vision but also his ability to get things done in proper fashion and order to sustain our civilization.

The problems that our country faces now are large and big and we need big ideas to get us through the swift moving currents of change that grip our country. The middle class is shrinking at an alarming rate, and without a middle class there will be no democracy for our children to grow up under. Manufacturing jobs have evaporated due to globalization and technological advances, and these jobs will never return. We have to invent new jobs, green jobs, to take their place and we desperately need these new jobs, and we need government intervention to help in retraining our workers on a massive scale to prepare us for our future.

The Middle East is a powder keg ready to explode at any minute with Iran pursuing nuclear arms and Syria murdering its own citizens. It seems likely that our intervention is only days or weeks away. And we need leadership badly. We need cooperation between Republicans and Democrats like never before. Our President can only do so much; he needs congress to help him.

While it is true that we are on the road to economic recovery, it is doubtful that we are on the road to emotional recovery in this nation. There is just too much hatred and vitriol among us that is left to be resolved. Both parties are involved, but the Republicans are the instigators of the national mood. They are ones who started the birther movement, then questioned President Obama’s religion, they just seem to nitpick everything he does and try to block all legislation he proposes. Mitch McConnell, a senate Republican leader, said at the outset of Obama’s presidency that his number one goal in life was to make Obama a one term president. Imagine that for leadership!

As a nation, we beg for leadership. Look at what Ronald Reagan was able to do in the 1980s! He took the stage by storm and galvanized this nation. President Obama is a leader, a visionary. He has a vision for our country, and it’s big and great. And all the Republican’s want to talk about is birth control.

The role of faith in the 2012 Presidential election

pf button both The role of faith in the 2012 Presidential election

Nearly all of us follow or adhere to some sort of faith or belief system. It’s what sustains us in times like 9/11 and provides us with joy during our respective holidays. It’s reflected in our values as a nation; in how we live our daily lives, how we worship, how we choose our close friends and business partners, and how we vote. We like to feel comfortable with our choices and our choices usually are reflections of who we are and what we stand for.

There are a few of us who are still skeptical of President Obama’s faith. In fact, 25% of us still believe he is Muslim. There are also a number of us who have questions and wonder about Mitt Romney’s faith, Mormonism.

Over the next several days, broken up in several parts, this writer will look at the faith of the Republican frontrunner, Mitt Romney, and that of the President, Barack Obama, and discuss the role of faith in the 2012 Presidential election. We will look into Romney’s background with his faith; compare Christianity with Mormonism doctrinally; and look at President Obama’s faith and how he has used it to guide him as he has governed our nation.

Mitt Romney is a devout and committed Mormon. He has devoted his entire life to the teachings of Mormonism and indeed, has never left or strayed from the faith. In fact, if you listen closely and carefully to him in his campaign speeches he alludes to his faith by saying things like, “Look at my life and how I have lived it” or “Look at my family.” This is about as close as we will come this year to hearing what Romney has to say about his faith. Faith, to Romney, is less theology than it is lifestyle. Yes, Mormonism has doctrines and we will cover them later but the centrality of its belief system is how well you live your life as opposed to the Christian standard of living by faith not works.

Romney was born into a family of faithful followers; the Romney’s form a long line of Mormons or Latter Day Saints, as they are also known as. In fact, one of his great-grandfathers fled to Mexico about 125 years ago, amid a government crackdown of polygamous marriages. It should be noted that many multi-generational Mormon families have polygamists in their family tree. Polygamy, by the way, is the practice of having more than one wife at the same time. Polygamy was introduced by Mormon Church founder Joseph Smith but was later banned by the church in 1890. Today, some 38,000 people aligned with the more fundamentalist fringe of the Mormon Church still practice polygamy.

Romney’s father, George, was born in Mexico but fled the when he was 5 due to the Mexican Revolution. George later became the CEO and Chairman of American Motors, Governor of Michigan, and a Presidential candidate himself in 1968. George was also very active in the Mormon Church, serving as Michigan’s first stake president. A stake president is comparable to a diocese in that it has multiple congregations.

As devout as he was, Mitt married outside the church. He found Ann, an Episcopalian, in high school. After high school, he left her behind and went off to college and on his Mormon mission trip, which was to France. While he was gone, Ann converted to Mormonism and they were wedded upon his return.

As Jessica Ravitz points out in her excellent article, The shaping of Mitt Romney, a look at his faith journey, Romney served as ‘A ward Bishop—or part-time pastor—and stake president for the Boston area in the 1980s and early 1990s.’

The question that many of us have is why Romney is so unwilling to discuss his Mormon faith while on the campaign trail? Could it be that the Mormons make unusual claims or have outrageous beliefs that many Americans would consider too extreme to accept?

One example of an outrageous belief is that Mormons believe there are 3 levels of Heaven. The first level is called Telestial for the bad people of the world. Yes, the Mormons believe they will be saved and go to Heaven. The second, or middle level, is for the good people. It’s called Terrestrial. Right, the Baptists, Hindus, Muslims, doesn’t matter what your religion is, if you’re a good moral person, then you go here. But the Mormon’s aim is the Celestial Kingdom. In order to have the Mormon concept of eternal life – which to them is different from being saved – to have eternal life means you can progress to be a god over your world someday. So all of this temple ritual they go through, this work for the dead, it’s all with the hope that this will add up to qualify them to have the reward of eternal life, where the Christian looks to Christ for eternal life through the grace of Christ that’s given to us – not because of any merit of our own, but because of the merit of Christ. Mormonism says “Well, yes, Christ’s atonement was necessary to get us into Heaven, but to get to that top-level and become a god, we have to achieve that. That is our reward for our faithfulness as a Mormon.” And only Mormons receive eternal life; the rest of us get some sort of sub-heaven and are never in the presence of our Heavenly Father.

Perhaps it is that but it could also be the Mormon belief that Jesus will rule, after the second coming, during the millennium in two places: Jerusalem and Independence, Missouri. Attached to this article, in the sidebar, is an interview in which Mitt Romney states that very fact.

These two examples alone are outside of mainstream Biblical thought. It really is no wonder that Romney remains silent about the one thing he cares most deeply about, his faith.

To be continued…

The role of faith in the 2012 Presidential election, part 2

pf button both The role of faith in the 2012 Presidential election, part 2

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) was birthed in 1820 by an alleged vision in which two celestial personages appeared to Joseph Smith, claiming all existing churches were wrong, all their creeds were an abomination, and all their professors were corrupt. According to those personages, Smith had been chosen to restore (not reform, but restore) a church that had disappeared from the face of the earth. The Mormon doctrines that have evolved from that vision compromise, confuse, or contradict the nature of God, the authority of scripture, and the way of salvation.

The question arises for us, is Mormonism a Christian belief system or is it a cult? For this, we turn to Sandra Tanner, Co-Founder of Utah Lighthouse Ministry. She is the great-great-granddaughter of Brigham Young and a leading expert on the Mormon religion.

Tanner: “Well, certainly, it represents a great heresy. If we’re going to say we’re Christian, we’ve got to adhere to some sort of standard; otherwise Buddhists could say they’re Christians. If the true test of Christianity is morality and good living and being a nice neighbor, I’m sure people in all kinds of religions would qualify under that kind of definition. But Christianity has always embodied a certain set of doctrines, and one of those doctrines is the absoluteness of the one eternal God, and that Jesus has eternally been God. Mormonism rejects both those concepts. Christianity has traditionally said God has spoken through the Bible, and that the New Testament is the standard for Christian beliefs. Mormonism rejects that and takes additional books of scripture that they believe supersede the Bible. The Bible is only secondary in their chain of authority; their other scriptures are paramount. So they get to redefine all the terms. But we also have to keep in mind that Joseph Smith himself was claiming that Christianity was in a total state of apostasy when he started Mormonism in 1830, and that what he started was the “only true church.” So when people become excited because we want to say Mormonism doesn’t fit under the Christian umbrella, you have to understand that Joseph Smith didn’t claim to fit under the Christian umbrella. He said he was doing something totally different than the Christian churches.”

Romney delivered an important speech on faith on December 6, 2007. In the speech, it’s obvious he wants to distance his public campaign for President away from his Mormon faith, to shield it from pressing questions. We can only speculate why but it leads us to question his ability to reason and to think logically, given the claims and history of the faith he adores. He claims that he will live by his faith as a Mormon while president, yet he refuses to answer questions about that very faith on the campaign trail. He addresses that in the speech by ducking behind the Constitution, saying, “There are some who would have a presidential candidate describe and explain his church’s distinctive doctrines. To do so would enable the religious test the founders prohibited in the Constitution.” Later in the speech, he makes it very clear that he will not put any church above the Constitution or the sovereign authority of the law. That is reassuring, of course, but it still does not satisfy those that have questions about his faith or his heartfelt personal beliefs on important issues that face the nation.

To be continued…